Załączniki

MDNPart3_hKaDlAM.txt

X-Account-Key: account9 X-UIDL: 00010a3f5704a634 X-Mozilla-Keys: Return-Path: <el.9b974d629bf86dacb22d884b8fa7a0da.1.siecobywatelska.smtp@news.emaillabs.co> Delivered-To: ug@gminaosiek.pl Received: from s171.cyber-folks.pl by s171.cyber-folks.pl with LMTP id OCTzHgxUFmKqTSwACZT8mw (envelope-from <el.9b974d629bf86dacb22d884b8fa7a0da.1.siecobywatelska.smtp@news.emaillabs.co>) for <ug@gminaosiek.pl>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:34:36 +0100 Return-path: <el.9b974d629bf86dacb22d884b8fa7a0da.1.siecobywatelska.smtp@news.emaillabs.co> Envelope-to: ug@gminaosiek.pl Delivery-date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:34:36 +0100 Received: from smtp2-2131.emaillabs.co ([185.243.31.151]) by s171.cyber-folks.pl with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <el.9b974d629bf86dacb22d884b8fa7a0da.1.siecobywatelska.smtp@news.emaillabs.co>) id 1nMtf0-00CCun-PM for ug@gminaosiek.pl; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:34:36 +0100 Received: from smtp2-2131 (smtp2-2131.emaillabs.co [185.243.31.151]) by smtp2-2131.emaillabs.co (SMTP) with ESMTP id 4K3g7t3MD0z8Rw4H for <ug@gminaosiek.pl>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:34:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emaillabs.co; s=emaillabs; t=1645630474; bh=h7w3JLBche/LTNe27oka1TPlRnB56NGvX3sseDRoBY8=; h=Subject:From:To:Reply-To:Date; b=mxzGF483EddF5f8V74PqnqfNeKxxcMEnI3RKLYLYsnq2ib1NjwU1Q1ORZT7DSSHL6 9yjOLK+StbcjKz2a6Z+19cXW+iVCyduSwCcgTuS0th54zIgMqyGizs8TA3Bilme/KB UuQnvJzWeVCEev9xzJ/5ITlb32/D2w8d6XOpA4QI= Received: from app-prod.watchdog.internal (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by app-prod.watchdog.internal (SMTP) with ESMTP id CDD251F0CA for <ug@gminaosiek.pl>; Wed, 23 Feb 2022 16:34:33 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============8646781276072623289==" MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: =?utf-8?q?wniosek_o_informacj=C4=99?= From: sprawa-44432@info.lasyiobywatele.pl To: ug@gminaosiek.pl Reply-To: sprawa-44432@info.lasyiobywatele.pl Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2022 15:34:33 -0000 Return-Receipt-To: sprawa-44432@info.lasyiobywatele.pl Disposition-Notification-To: sprawa-44432@info.lasyiobywatele.pl Message-ID: <164563047379.17732.11771249756255231987@info.lasyiobywatele.pl> Feedback-ID: :siecobywatelska.emaillabs.co:1.siecobywatelska.smtp:emaillabs X-Sid: 9b974d629bf86dacb22d884b8fa7a0da@emaillabs.co X-Return-Path: <el.9b974d629bf86dacb22d884b8fa7a0da.1.siecobywatelska.smtp@news.emaillabs.co> Forward-Confirmed-ReverseDNS: Reverse and forward lookup success on 185.243.31.151, -10 Spam score SPFCheck: Server passes SPF test, -30 Spam score X-DKIM: signer='emaillabs.co' status='pass' reason='' DKIMCheck: Server passes DKIM test, -20 Spam score X-Spam-Score: 2.1 (++) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "s171.cyber-folks.pl", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: W związku z wnioskiem o dostęp do informacji publicznej przesłanym do Państwa w dniu 21 lutego wyjaśniamy że pytanie nr 1 &quot;Czy przedstawiciele gminy/miasta zgłaszali wnioski podczas konsultacji społecznych Planów Urządzenia Lasu organizowanych przez Lasy Państwowe dla nadleśnictw znajdujących się na terenie [...] Content analysis details: (2.1 points, 5.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: emaillabs.co] 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: emaillabs.co] 0.2 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail domains are different 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.0 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE No description available. SpamTally: Final spam score: -39 X-Antivirus-Scanner: Clean mail though you should still use an Antivirus